Even if you reject the whole ideas in the book after reading it fully, then also you gained. You had done a good thought process which could reinforce your beliefs with sufficient reason. You had internally answered to all different questions being asked in the book.

It was a wonderful experience for me reading the CWG book series. I feel a lot of expansion in my awareness, and understanding of others. I thank God for this gift.

It is wonderful also to hear that you learned about Thomas Campbell’s work so early on – that must be great. I am just new to his work, but very grateful that I found it when I did…or should I say, it found me.

And you are right, I do think that these two complement each other very well. I can think of the discussions about time especially and death. I would say that the CWG material is the more “romantic” version of the two and more understandable and accessible to people. However, the TOE offers the real time science for what they both talk about.

So yes, they do complement each other very well, and it just depends on what a person gravitates more toward, perhaps even both of these versions about life and our reality will appeal to more and more people today…

Thanks for your input Andie, very much appreciated!

I just read your post about Tom’s Big TOE. I’m also a HUGE fan of God and Neale Donald Walsch.

I often think about how much both of these triogies have changed my life. I came to the TOE long before CWG, but I found that the two works really complement each other.

What are your opinions as for as comparing these two models?

:)
Andie

@ SARA – Oh that is fantastic to hear that you are familiar with this book too! (or books ;)

And I so agree Sara, I think that is what made me feel so good about these books, despite any discomfort I was feeling. It is that if I pictured or talked to a God within me, that is exactly how I “envisioned” God. It was as if this was my own personal conversation and that is what made it even more powerful for me!

Thanks for sharing your experience!

Unfortunately, I must have lent someone book one, but I have book two. I had forgotten how refreshing and funny I found these books. The conversations were so straight forward.

I really liked the God Neale talked to. Certainly, his conversations were the way I wanted to think of conversing with God. I spent too many years living the concept of an angry mean God. Conversations with God opened my eyes. Thanks for the reminder.

I’m going to spend some time tonight reviewing this book…I think it would do me a lot of good.

Thanks, this is a great addition here!